As Pakistan battles one of the worst economic crises in its history, its long-standing tensions with India are compounding the damage in ways both visible and structural.
As the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor promises to redraw trade and connectivity maps, digital infrastructure must be treated not as a secondary benefit-but as a foundational pillar of its strategic viability.
As governments shift from sole operators to facilitators, private firms are reshaping the economics, pace, and ambitions of space exploration. India, the United States, China, and Europe are responding in markedly different ways, each illuminating a distinct model of public-private cooperation in the cosmos.
As the global order fragments and multilateralism faces its sharpest test in decades, reforming the United Nations Security Council is no longer a question of principle; it is a matter of institutional survival.
With China’s increasing presence in the Indo-Pacific region, Southeast Asian nations need to reassess how economic diversification can help them avoid overdependence on China.
Amid shifting global alignments and regional recalibrations, China’s conciliatory posture toward India signals a tactical recalibration-but not a strategic shift.
As protectionism resurfaces in U.S. trade policy, India faces both familiar headwinds and new opportunities to recalibrate its global economic strategy.
In an era of fractured alliances and fluid coalitions, India’s doctrine of strategic autonomy offers a viable model for states seeking sovereignty without isolation.
India’s principled resistance to exclusive frameworks like the Artemis Accords underscores the need for inclusive, UN-led space governance in a multipolar world.
The IMEC Corridor is fast becoming a necessity for the world to transcend geo-politics roadblocks and collaborate for future trade security.
As the new Trump administration heralds the end of the Transatlantic alliance, it marks the post-war moment in the third decade of the 21st Century.
As we enter the new year, hopefully more parts of the world will learn to see through the lies propagated under the ‘protecting democracy’ agenda to explain the intervention of the West in other countries’ electoral processes.